docs(review): side-by-side fidelity evidence for the toilville deck pipeline #103
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
priority
P1
priority
P2
priority
P3
priority
P4
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
Toilville/toilville-design!103
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "docs/toilville-site-fidelity-evidence"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Backing evidence for #102.
Renders the five toilville.com pages design vs generated so the fidelity
gaps flagged in #101 are visible rather than described. Left is the deck source,
right (terracotta border) is what
build_surfaces.pyproduces today.Includes
render-comparison.py, the harness that builds the two HTML documentsper page, so the comparison is reproducible rather than a one-off screenshot.
The generated side is styled from the real palette in
udg/products/wp-themes/toilville-fse/styles/toilville.json— WordPress's blockCSS isn't present locally, so the classes the pattern emits
(
has-brand-primary-background-color,wp-block-buttons, …) are mapped to thesame token values WP would resolve. No colour is invented.
2.3MB of PNGs. If you'd rather not carry binaries in the repo, say so and I'll
move them somewhere else — but #102's image links point at this branch, so they
break if it's deleted without merging.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01Kbzfscp4w5enUrZxMnDt78